Skip to content
RTI

For QA/QC managers

The quality plan, enforced on the phone.

You wrote the QC plan, the hold points and the NCR process. RTI turns that plan into the checklist a crew has to complete before they can submit anything, and writes every step to a record no one can quietly edit later.

The same home screen on a phone, with the review queue and setup steps stacked for use with one hand
The inspections list on a phone, showing status tabs and cards tagged by unit with the scan button in the bottom bar
Checklist templates on a phone, with your templates and the RTI library filtered by category
Reports on a phone, with period filters and headline quality metrics stacked in one column
The activity log on a phone, with the verify chain, filters, and chained events in one column

A real inspection point

What this looks like on your job

One tag, one checklist, and the photos that have to come with it.

Tag

Level 5 Riser, Firestop Verification

HSP-L5-RSR-03

Sticker location
Mechanical riser at the north shaft wall
Bound checklist
Firestop verification, QC hold point
  • Penetration cleaned and correct sleeve or backing confirmed2 photos required
  • Listed firestop system matched to the penetration type2 photos required
  • Installation depth and detail per the manufacturer listing2 photos required
  • System labeled with product and installer1 photo required

What gets in the way, and what RTI does about it

Today

The QC plan lives in a binder and a shared drive, and whether a hold point actually gets inspected comes down to whether the crew on shift felt like following it that day.

With RTI

The plan becomes the checklist bound to the tag, and the phone won't submit until the mandatory items and photos are complete. The hold point is enforced at the point of work, not left to memory or goodwill.

Today

NCRs get tracked in a spreadsheet that shows they were opened but never really proves they were closed, and re-work happens off to the side with no photos.

With RTI

A non-conformance is rejected on the board with its reason, and the corrected re-submission carries its own new photos and answers. The full path from raised to resolved is on the activity log, so closure is proven, not assumed.

Today

When an owner or auditor asks you to prove the plan was followed, you're assembling evidence that anyone could have edited, and you can't show it wasn't.

With RTI

The record is a SHA-256 hash chain: change one entry and every later hash stops matching, visibly and permanently. You export the project with photos, signatures and the trail, and the record itself demonstrates it wasn't altered.

Questions QA/QC managers ask

How do I stop hold points from getting skipped in the field?
You bind the hold-point checklist to a QR tag on the actual location. Scanning opens exactly that checklist, and the submit button stays locked until every mandatory item is answered and every required photo is attached. The gate is enforced by the database, not left to whether the crew remembered your plan.
How are NCRs handled?
A non-conforming submission is rejected on the review board with the reason attached, and it drops into the rejected lane instead of passing. The crew sees what failed and re-submits corrected work with new photos. Every state change, from raised to resolved, is written to the activity log.
How do I prove to an owner or an auditor that the plan was actually followed?
Every action is written to an activity log that hashes each entry over the previous one with SHA-256, so altering any record breaks every hash after it. You export the tag, unit or project as a PDF or CSV with the answers, photos, signatures and the audit trail intact, and it stands on its own.

Put it on a real job.

Tag one area, run one walk, and see the record it leaves behind. Start free. 30 days, no card required.