Skip to content
RTI

For project managers

Closeout that builds itself while the job runs.

You carry the schedule, the budget and the turnover package. RTI files every signed-off inspection to the record as it happens, so the closeout package is assembling itself in the background and a backcharge argument becomes a dated record instead of a debate.

The same home screen on a phone, with the review queue and setup steps stacked for use with one hand
The inspections list on a phone, showing status tabs and cards tagged by unit with the scan button in the bottom bar
Checklist templates on a phone, with your templates and the RTI library filtered by category
Reports on a phone, with period filters and headline quality metrics stacked in one column
The activity log on a phone, with the verify chain, filters, and chained events in one column

A real inspection point

What this looks like on your job

One tag, one checklist, and the photos that have to come with it.

Tag

Suite 400, Owner Turnover

MOB-4-STE400

Sticker location
Inside face of entry door, Suite 400
Bound checklist
Final walk, owner turnover
  • Punch list items closed and re-verified2 photos required
  • All finishes accepted with no visible damage3 photos required
  • MEP systems tested and commissioning documents attached1 photo required
  • Keys, warranties and O&M manuals logged1 photo required

What gets in the way, and what RTI does about it

Today

The job is substantially complete and now three people spend two weeks pulling photos out of phones and signatures out of inboxes to build the closeout binder.

With RTI

Every approved inspection is already filed to its tag as the work happened. At turnover you export the project as a branded PDF or CSV, complete with answers, photos and signoffs, instead of reassembling it after the fact.

Today

A sub disputes a backcharge months later and it comes down to your word against theirs, with no dated proof of the condition you're charging for.

With RTI

The record shows the tag, the date, the photos and the signature, on a hash-chained log that breaks visibly if anyone edits it. The dispute is settled by the record, not by whoever argues longest.

Today

The owner asks for documentation to release a payment, and answering means chasing the field and the trades for paperwork that lives in five places.

With RTI

The documentation is already on the tags, and the owner can review and sign it from a scoped portal login. You attach the record to the pay application instead of spending a week collecting it.

Questions project managers ask

Why is closeout always a scramble, and how does RTI change that?
Because the proof gets created all through the job and collected all at the end, out of camera rolls and email threads. RTI files each inspection to the tag as it's approved, so at turnover the package already exists. You export the project as a branded PDF or CSV instead of rebuilding it from memory.
How does this help when a sub disputes a backcharge?
You stop arguing from recollection. Every submission carries the tag, the timestamp, the photos and who signed it, on an activity log that hashes each entry over the last one. What was done, when, and by whom is a dated record, so the conversation is about the record, not about whose memory is better.
Can the owner sign off without me chasing paper across the team?
Yes. You give the client a portal login scoped to the projects you choose. They review the evidence and sign off from their phone, and that signoff lands on the same tamper-evident record your team already works from. No emailed PDFs to reconcile later.

Put it on a real job.

Tag one area, run one walk, and see the record it leaves behind. Start free. 30 days, no card required.