We already use a general checklist app. Why switch for QA?

Generic form apps are built to collect answers, not to prove work in the field. They have no concept of a QR-tagged inspection point on a physical thing, they treat photos as optional attachments, and their records can be edited after submission. For construction QA, those are the parts that matter, and they are the parts a general form tool leaves out.

Can't we just make a photo field required in a form builder?

You can ask for a photo, but a form field is a UI hint the app can skip, autofill or submit empty. RTI's photo gate is enforced by the database: the submit button stays locked until every mandatory item is confirmed and every required photo is attached, so incomplete work cannot be recorded as complete at all.

What does purpose-built for construction actually give us at turnover?

An export built for handover. RTI produces a branded PDF of any inspection or a project's approved inspections, with checklist answers, photos, signatures and signoffs, with the data as CSV, backed by a tamper evident log. A general form app tends to give you a flat data dump that still needs to be turned into something a client can sign against.

Checklist apps vs RTI

A generic form app was never built for the wall.

Off-the-shelf checklist and form apps are good at collecting answers. Construction QA needs more than answers: a tag on the physical thing, a photo requirement that cannot be skipped, a record where any edit after the fact shows, and an export built for handover. RTI is built for exactly that.

Start free Browse the checklist library

The RTI home screen: what needs you, with inspections awaiting review, awaiting client sign off and needing rework, then recent activity

The RTI mobile app's home screen: start an inspection by scanning a tag, seven inspections waiting on a decision, and the week in numbers

The RTI review board with submitted, in review, approved and rejected lanes of inspection cards tagged by unit, trade and pass count

An electrical rough-in inspection under review in the RTI mobile app: six jobsite photos of wiring, boxes and the panel, with send back and approve

The RTI activity log where every action is chained by SHA-256 fingerprint, with a verify chain control and absolute UTC timestamps

The activity log in the RTI mobile app: the audit chain check passed with a verify now control, then today's submissions by person, tag and time

The comparison

What gets in the way, and what RTI does about it

Checklist apps compared with Ready To Inspect, problem by problem.
Checklist apps	Ready To Inspect
Checklist appsA generic form has no idea what a physical inspection point is. You pick the location from a dropdown and hope the person chose the right one.	Ready To InspectA printed QR tag lives on the actual panel, unit or riser. Scanning it opens that thing's tag, one tap from the exact checklist bound to it, so the point is chosen by standing in front of it, not by guessing in a menu.
Checklist appsThe photo field is optional, or the form submits with it empty, so half the records that matter most have no picture behind them.	Ready To InspectThe photo gate is enforced in the database, not the interface. The submission cannot be sent until every required photo is attached, so a record with a photo requirement can't be complete without its evidence.
Checklist appsRecords in a general form tool can be edited or deleted after the fact, and the export is a flat spreadsheet nobody would sign against.	Ready To InspectEvery submission and review decision is hash chained with SHA-256, so an edit after the fact breaks the chain and shows. Export any inspection, or a project's approved inspections, as a branded PDF with answers, photos, signatures and signoffs, with the data as CSV.

A real inspection point

What this looks like on your job

One tag, one checklist, and the photos that have to come with it.

Tag

Panelboard LP-2, Final

CIV-A-L1-LP2

Sticker location: Face of panel LP-2, electrical room 1E-108
Assigned checklist: Panelboard final, QA signoff

Breaker labeling matches panel schedule1 photo required
Lug torque marks applied to spec2 photos required
Dead front secured, no exposed conductors1 photo required
Arc-flash and equipment labels affixed1 photo required

Checklists for your work

Start from a checklist that already knows the walk

Real guides from the RTI library. Sections in build order, what to look for on each item, and the photos that prove it. Free to read, one click to run on a tag.

Browse the full library

Questions about checklist apps vs RTI

3 answers

We already use a general checklist app. Why switch for QA?: Generic form apps are built to collect answers, not to prove work in the field. They have no concept of a QR-tagged inspection point on a physical thing, they treat photos as optional attachments, and their records can be edited after submission. For construction QA, those are the parts that matter, and they are the parts a general form tool leaves out.
Can't we just make a photo field required in a form builder?: You can ask for a photo, but a form field is a UI hint the app can skip, autofill or submit empty. RTI's photo gate is enforced by the database: the submit button stays locked until every mandatory item is confirmed and every required photo is attached, so incomplete work cannot be recorded as complete at all.
What does purpose-built for construction actually give us at turnover?: An export built for handover. RTI produces a branded PDF of any inspection or a project's approved inspections, with checklist answers, photos, signatures and signoffs, with the data as CSV, backed by a tamper evident log. A general form app tends to give you a flat data dump that still needs to be turned into something a client can sign against.

Put it on a real job.

Tag one area, run one walk, and see the record it leaves behind.

Start free See how it works

30-day trial · No card required