Skip to content
RTI

PDF markup vs RTI

A cloud on a drawing is not a closed item.

Marking up a plan set is a fast way to point at a problem. It is a poor way to prove the problem was fixed. RTI ties every item to the real thing on the wall and to a checklist that will not submit until every required item is confirmed and its photos are attached.

The RTI mobile app's home screen: start an inspection by scanning a tag, seven inspections waiting on a decision, and the week in numbers
An electrical rough-in inspection under review in the RTI mobile app: six jobsite photos of wiring, boxes and the panel, with send back and approve
The activity log in the RTI mobile app: the audit chain check passed with a verify now control, then today's submissions by person, tag and time
The comparison

What gets in the way, and what RTI does about it

PDF markup compared with Ready To Inspect, problem by problem.
PDF markupReady To Inspect
PDF markupA punch cloud on the PDF says a defect existed. It never says the defect was fixed, and no photo is required to close it out.Ready To InspectEvery punch item can carry its own required closeout photo, and the inspection cannot be submitted until those photos are attached, so 'closed' means there is a picture of the finished work, not a checked box.
PDF markupThe markup lives at a coordinate on a sheet. Whoever chases it still has to work out which physical room that cloud belongs to.Ready To InspectThe tag is stuck to the real door. You scan what is in front of you and the punch list is one tap away, with no translating between a plan and the building.
PDF markupSomeone issues a new revision of the set, the old markup layer is gone, and there is no record that the item was ever raised.Ready To InspectEvery item lives on the tag's record, not on a drawing revision. Each submission and review decision is hashed over the previous one with SHA-256, so the history cannot quietly drift when the drawings change.
A real inspection point

What this looks like on your job

One tag, one checklist, and the photos that have to come with it.

Tag

Unit 214, Interior Punch

PKW-C-L2-214

Sticker location
Inside face of unit entry door
Assigned checklist
Interior finish punch, pre-turnover
  • Wall finish free of roller marks and touch-up flashing1 photo required
  • Door hardware aligned, latching and keyed1 photo required
  • Caulk lines at trim and casework continuous1 photo required
  • Outlet and switch plates flush, level and covered2 photos required

Questions about PDF markup vs RTI

3 answers

What is wrong with marking up the drawings for punch?
Nothing, as a way to point. The gap is proof. A cloud and a note sit on a sheet, not on the door they describe. Nobody has to attach a photo, nobody has to close it, and the next revision of the set can quietly drop the markup. You end up trusting a picture of the building instead of the building.
How does a QR tag beat a pin on a plan?
A pin lives at a coordinate on a sheet; someone still has to translate it to the physical room. An RTI tag is stuck to the actual door, panel or unit. You scan the thing in front of you and its checklist is one tap away, so there is no reading the plan to figure out which item you are standing at.
How does RTI stop items from being called done when they are not?
The photo gate. A punch inspection cannot be submitted until every mandatory item is confirmed and every required closeout photo is attached. There is no way to mark a required item complete with an empty box, which is exactly what a checked-off markup lets you do.

Put it on a real job.

Tag one area, run one walk, and see the record it leaves behind.

30-day trial · No card required